We all love movies, and one of the biggest changes we've seen in filmmaking over the past few years is how YouTube impacts the way we interact with the medium. From the moment a trailer for an anticipated film comes out, fans, bloggers, and YouTube hosts break down every aspect, looking for Easter Eggs, plot details, and cameos. Then, when a film is released there is an instant reaction - hundreds, if not thousands, flock to their webcams to deconstruct a largely subjective art form. These pundits range in style and quality, but what they all have in common is that they get us talking (often arguing) about film and its impact in our lives. We will use specific examples to illustrate the point and facilitate thoughtful reflection, but we don't want to draw any conclusions for the people attending the panel. Some examples - Michael Barryte created a hugely viral video called "What if Episode I Was Good?" which generated nearly 4 million views, and sparked a lot of conversation about Star Wars, the legacy of George Lucas, the balance of character and plot, fan service vs. pushing new boundaries, the protagonist's role, etc. For some this video put into words their own concerns with the film, for others it was just an attack on a beloved film. The reality is that ALL of these views are valid, because art ultimately belongs to those beholding it. But, does our shared experience create a sense that we're *supposed* to have smart takes on films, and do the opinions of others color our own? Do channels that celebrate the art form (like "Every Frame a Painting" or "Movies With Mikey") help us understand it better, and do those who do extreme deconstructions (like "CinemaSins", "Honest Trailers", and "Pitch Meetings") make us look for the bad in film as much as the good? And what does that say about our experience?